Does Allaah accept a person’s repentance every time he sins and repents, even if he does that many times


Does Allaah accept a person’s repentance every time he sins and repents, even if he does that many times?
For how long does Allaah forgive a person’s sin? If he repents and seeks forgiveness from his sin, then goes and commits the same sin again, then he seeks forgiveness again then commits the same sin again, and so on – does Allaah forgive him or does that means that he is not sincere towards Allaah, especially if he repeats that sin after a short while, but he does not stop seeking forgiveness?.



Praise be to Allaah.


Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And those who, when they have committed Faahishah (illegal sexual intercourse) or wronged themselves with evil, remember Allaah and ask forgiveness for their sins; — and none can forgive sins but Allaah — and do not persist in what (wrong) they have done, while they know.

136. For such, the reward is forgiveness from their Lord, and Gardens with rivers flowing underneath (Paradise), wherein they shall abide forever. How excellent is this reward for the doers (who do righteous deeds according to Allaah’s Orders)”


[Aal ‘Imraan 3:135-136]

Ibn Katheer said:

The words “and do not persist in what (wrong) they have done” mean: they repent from their sins and quickly turn to Allaah, and they do not persist in their sin, rather they give it up, and if they do that again they repent to Him.

Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 1/408.

It was narrated that Abu Hurayrah said: I heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “A person committed a sin and said: ‘My Lord, I have sinned; forgive me.’ His Lord said: ‘Is My slave acknowledging that he has a Lord Who forgives sins and punishes for them? I have forgiven My slave.’ Then as much time passed as Allaah willed, then he committed a sin and said, ‘My Lord, I have sinned; forgive me.’ His Lord said: ‘Is My slave acknowledging that he has a Lord Who forgives sins and punishes for them? I have forgiven My slave.’ Then as much time passed as Allaah willed, then he committed a sin and said, ‘My Lord, I have sinned; forgive me.’ His Lord said: ‘Is My slave acknowledging that he has a Lord Who forgives sins and punishes for them? I have forgiven My slave,’ – three times…”

Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 7507; Muslim, 2758.

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) included this hadeeth under the heading: “Acceptance of repentance from sins even if the sins and repentance happen repeatedly.”

He said in his Sharh:

We have already discussed this issue at the beginning of the Book of Repentance. These ahaadeeth clearly point to that, and even if the sin is repeated a hundred times or a thousand times or more, and he repents each time, his repentance will be accepted and his sin will be erased. And if he repents once from them all, his repentance will be valid.

Sharh Muslim, 17.75.

Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali said:

‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azeez said: O people, whoever commits a sin, let him seek the forgiveness of Allaah and repent, and if he repeats it, let him seek the forgiveness of Allaah and repent, and if he repeats it, let him seek the forgiveness of Allaah and repent, for it is like chains around the neck of man, and doom lies in persisting in it.



What this means is that a person will inevitably commit the sins that it is decreed he will commit, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The son of Adam’s share of zina is decreed for him, and he will inevitably come to that…” But Allaah has given him a way out from the sins that he falls into and He erases them by means of repentance and seeking forgiveness. If he does that then he will escape from the evil of sin, but if he persists in his sin he will be doomed.

Jaami’ al-‘Uloom al-Hakam, 1/165.

Although Allaah hates sin and warns of punishment for it, He does not want His slaves to despair of His mercy. He likes the sinner to seek His forgiveness and repent to Him, but the Shaytaan likes it when despair fills a person’s heart and prevents him from repenting and turning to Allaah.

It was said to al-Hasan al-Basri: Would not any one of us feel ashamed before his Lord to seek forgiveness from his sin then go back to it, then seek forgiveness then go back to it? He said: The Shaytaan would like you to feel that way; never give up seeking forgiveness.

READ ALSO:  

Persisting in sin
What will happened to that person doing same sin again and again ?.
http://islamqa.com/en/ref/9231 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE: http://islamqa.com/en/ref/45887/sins 

Proper Manners To Answer The Telephone

What follows is beneficial knowledge from AshShaykh Al’Allaamah AlAlbaanee(rahimahullaah) transmitted by way of his student Saalih bin Taha Abu Islaam in his book entitled, (what translated means) Al’aqeedah first, if they but only knew (Vol 1, pgs. 16-17), wherein he (Abu Islaam) said,
He called me rahimahullaah (meaning AshShaykh AlAlbaanee) one day by telephone, but I was not there. My young daughter, upon answering the telephone, said, “Assalaamu ‘alaikum wa rahmatullaah”. The Shaykh asked for me and then said to her, “Inform your father that Muhammad Naasiriddeen AlAlbaanee called”. (He did not say ‘AshShaykh’ . . . and this is from his humbleness, may Allaah raise his rank in Aljannah)”.


“When I returned home, my daughter informed me that a man by the name of Muhammad Naasiriddeen AlAlbaanee had called. I returned his call immediately. After he (the Shaykh) requested from me that which he had wanted, he said, “Oh Abaa Islaam, when I phoned you your young daughter answered and said, “Assalaamu ‘alaikum wa rahmatullaah” . Is this an action (mannerism) based on knowledge? Or just (your) young (daughter’s) personal action (mannerism)? We want to (derive) benefit (from this) Oh Abaa Islaam”. And this (the comment of the Shaykh) is also from his humbleness and wisdom in (conveying) Adda’wah. Then I said to him, “Truly this is from the action (mannerism) of (my young daughter) and for the first time”.
“From that which we know in this situation is that when a man (meaning collectively – ‘anyone’) answers the telephone he says, “Na’am” (Yes), then the person calling gives assalaam to the person he has called (by saying “Assalaamu ‘alaikum . . .”), then the person who answers the call returns assalaam. He (the one answering the call) does not begin with “Assalaamu ‘alaikum . . . .”
Then he (the Shaykh) rahimahullaah said: “This is from that which we know to be correct. Because the person calling is like the person who knocks on the door. There is no difference between them.
Explanation of what is to be derived from this beneficial knowledge:
From that which has been transmitted to us of the words of AshShaykh Al’Allaamah AlAlbaanee, through his student Saalih bin Taha, is that we are to answer the telephone with the word ‘Na’am’. The answerer does not give salaam first. The one calling is to give salaam first and then we respond to their salaam. The daleel is based upon that which is the proper manner (adab) for knocking on a door and the response to it.
HADITH : KNOCKING ON DOORS
Imam Ahmad recorded a narration stating that Anas or someone else said that the Messenger of Allah ( sallahu alayhi wasallam) asked for permission to enter upon Sa`d bin `Ubadah. He said: (As-Salamu `Alayka wa Rahmatullah)
Sa`d said, “Wa `Alaykas-Salam Wa Rahmatullah,” but the Prophet did not hear the returned greeting until he had given the greeting three times and Sa`d had returned the greeting three times, but he did not let him hear him [i.e., Sa`d responded in a low voice].
So the Prophet went back, and Sa`d followed him and said,”O Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransomed for you! You did not give any greeting but I responded to you,but I did not let you hear me. I wanted to get more of your Salams and blessings.”(<<<<*smile* )
Then he admitted him to his house and offered him some raisins. The Prophet ate, and when he finished, he said,
(May the righteous eat your food, may the angels send blessings upon you and may those who are fasting break their fast with you.)
DO NOT STAND DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE DOOR
It should also be known that the one who is seeking permission to enter should not stand directly in front of the door; he should have the door on his right or left, because of the Hadith recorded by Abu Dawud from `Abdullah bin Busr, who said, “When the Messenger of Allah came to someone’s door, he would never stand directly in front of it, but to the right or left, and he would say,
(As-Salamu `Alaykum, As-Salamu `Alaykum.)
Bid’ah.

This issue may be divided into three topics:

1. Definition of bid’ah 2. Categories of bid’ah 3. Rulings on one who commits bid’ah – does that make him a kaafir or not?

1. Definition of bid’ah.

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “According to sharee’ah, the definition is ‘Worshipping Allaah in ways that Allaah has not prescribed.’ If you wish you may say, ‘Worshipping Allaah in ways that are not those of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his rightly guided successors (al-khulafaa’ al-raashidoon).’”

The first definition is taken from the aayah (interpretation of the meaning):

“Or have they partners with Allaah (false gods) who have instituted for them a religion which Allaah has not ordained?” [al-Shooraa 42:21]

The second definition is taken from the hadeeth of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), who said:

“I urge you to adhere to my way (Sunnah) and the way of the rightly-guided successors (al-khulafa’ al-raashidoon) who come after me. Hold fast to it and bite onto it with your eyeteeth [i.e., cling firmly to it], and beware of newly-invented matters.”

So everyone who worships Allaah in a manner that Allaah has not prescribed or in a manner that is not in accordance with the way of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his rightly-guided successors (al-khulafa’ al-raashidoon), is an innovator, whether that innovated worship has to do with the names and attributes of Allaah, or to do with His rulings and laws.

With regard to ordinary matters of habit and custom, these are not called bid’ah (innovation) in Islam, even though they may be described as such in linguistic terms. But they are not innovations in the religious sense, and these are not the things that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was warning us against.

And there is no such thing in Islam as bid’ah hasanah (good innovation).”

(Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, vol. 2, p. 291)

2. Categories of bid’ah

Bid’ah may be divided into two categories:

(i) bid’ah which constitutes kufr

(ii) bid’ah which does not constitute kufr

If you ask, what is the definition of bid’ah which constitutes kufr and that which does not constitute kufr?

The answer is:

Shaykh Haafiz al-Hukami (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “The kind of bid’ah which constitutes kufr is when one denies a matter on which there is scholarly consensus, which widely-known, and which no Muslim can have any excuse for not knowing, such as denying something that is obligatory, making something obligatory that is not obligatory, or making something haraam halaal, or making something halaal haraam; or believing some notion about Allaah, His Messenger and His Book when they are far above that, whether in terms of denial of affirmation – because that means disbelieving in the Qur’aan and in the message with which Allaah sent His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

Examples include the bid’ah of the Jahamiyyah, who denied the attributes of Allaah; or the notion that the Qur’aan was created; or the notion that some of the attributes of Allaah were created; or the bid’ah of the Qadariyyah who denied the knowledge and actions of Allaah; or the bid’ah of the Mujassimah who likened Allaah to His creation… etc.

The second category, bid’ah which does not constitute kufr, is defined as that which does not imply rejection of the Qur’aan or of anything with which Allaah sent His Messengers.

Examples include the Marwaani bid’ahs (which were denounced by the greatest Sahaabah who did not approve of them, although they did not denounce them as kaafirs or refuse to give them bay’ah because of that), such as delaying some of the prayers until the end of the due times, doing the Eid khutbah before the Eid prayer, delivering the khutbah whilst sitting down on Fridays, etc.

(Ma’aarij al-Qubool, 2/503-504)

3- The ruling on one who commits bid’ah – is he regarded as a kaafir or not?

The answer is that it depends.

If the bid’ah constitutes kufr, then the person is one of the following two types:

(i) Either it is known that his intention is to destroy the foundations of Islam and make the Muslims doubt it. Such a person is definitely a kaafir; indeed, he is a stranger to Islam and is one of the enemies of the faith.

(ii) Or he is deceived and confused; he cannot be denounced as a kaafir until proof is established against him, fair and square.

If the bid’ah does not constitute kufr, then he should not be denounced as a kaafir. Rather, he remains a Muslim, but he has done a gravely evil action.

If you ask, how should we deal with those who commit bid’ah?

The answer is:

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “In both cases, we have to call these people – who claim to be Muslim but who commit acts of bid’ah which may constitute kufr or may be less than that – to the truth, by explaining the truth without being hostile or condemning what they are doing. But once we know that they are too arrogant to accept the truth – for Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning), ‘And insult not those whom they (disbelievers) worship besides Allaah, lest they insult Allaah wrongfully without knowledge.’ [al-An’aam 6:108] – if we find out that they are stubborn and arrogant, then we should point out their falsehood, because then pointing out their falsehood becomes an obligation upon us.

With regard to boycotting them, that depends upon the bid’ah. If it is a bid’ah which constitutes kufr, then it is obligatory to boycott the person who does it. If it is of a lesser degree than that, then it is essential to examine the situation further. If something may be achieved by boycotting the person, then we do it; if no purpose will be served by it, or if it will only make him more disobedient and arrogant, then we should avoid doing that, because whatever serves no purpose, it is better not to do it. And also in principle it is haraam to boycott a believer, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘It is not permissible for a man to forsake [not speak to] his brother for more than three [days].’”

(Adapted from Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, vol. 2, p. 293)
   The ruling concerning Mawlid 

                     an- Nabawi

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The commands mentioned in the Qur`aan and Sunnah to follow the laws of Allaah and His Messenger and the prohibitions of introducing innovations into the religion are quite clear. Allaah says that which translates as:
“Say, [O Muhammad], ‘If you should love Allaah, then follow me, [So] Allaah will love you and forgive you your sins.’ ”
(Aal ‘Imraan: 31)
“Follow, [O Mankind], what has been revealed to you from your Lord and do not follow other than Him any allies. Little do you remember.”
(Al-A’raaf: 3)
“And [Moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way.”
(Al-An‘aam: 153)
The Prophet (r) said:
“The most truthful of speech is the Book of Allaah and the best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad, and the most evil of things are those which are newly-invented.”
And he (r) said:
“Whoever innovates anything in this matter of ours (i.e., Islaam), that is not part of it will have it rejected.” (Bukhaari & Muslim)
According to a version narrated by Muslim,
“Whoever does anything that is not in accordance with this matter of ours (i.e., Islaam), will have it rejected.”
Among the reprehensible innovations that people have invented is the celebration of the birthday of the Prophet (r) (Al-Mawlid) in the month of Rabee’ Al-Awwal. They celebrate this occasion in various ways:
·  Some of them simply make it an occasion to gather and read the story of Al-Mawlid, then they present speeches and Qaseedahs (odes) for this occasion.
·  Some of them make food and sweets etc., and offer them to the people present.
·  Some of them hold these celebrations in the mosques, and some of them hold them in their houses.
·  Some people do not limit themselves to the actions mentioned above; they include in these gatherings Haraam and reprehensible things, such as free mixing between men and women, dancing and singing, or committing actions of Shirk such as seeking the help of the Prophet (r), calling upon him, seeking his support against their enemies and so on.
Whatever form it takes and whatever the intentions of those who do this are, there is no doubt whatsoever that it is an invented, Haraam innovation which was introduced by the Shee’ah Faatimids after the three best centuries of Islaam, in order to corrupt the religion of the Muslims. The next person to do this after them and re-introduce it was King Al-Mudhaffar Abu Sa‘eed Kawkaboori, the king of Irbil, at the end of the sixth century or the beginning of the seventh century AH, as was mentioned by the historians such as Ibn Khalkaan, may Allaah have mercy upon him, and others.
Abu Shaamah, may Allaah have mercy upon him, said:
“The first person to do that in Mosul was Shaykh ‘Umar Ibn Muhammad Al-Malaa, one of the well-known righteous people. Then the ruler of Irbil and others followed his example.”
Ibn Katheer, may Allaah have mercy upon him, said in his biography of Abu Sa’eed Kazkaboori:
“He used to observe the Mawlid in Rabee’ Al-Awwal and hold a huge celebration on that occasion… some of those who were present at the feast of Al-Muzaffar on some occasions of the Mawlid said that he used to offer in the feast five thousand grilled heads of sheep, ten thousand chickens and one hundred thousand large dishes, and thirty trays of sweets… he would let the Sufis sing from Dhuhr until Fajr, and he himself would dance with them.”
Ibn Khalkaan, may Allaah have mercy upon him, said:
“When it is the first of Safar they decorate those domes with various kinds of fancy adornments, and in every dome there sits a group of singers and a group of puppeteers and players of musical instruments, and they do not leave any one of those domes without setting up a group (of performers) there. The people give up work during this period, and they do no work except for going around and watching the entertainment. When there are two days to go until the Mawlid, they bring out a large number of camels, cows and sheep, more than can be described, and they accompany them with all the drums, songs and musical instruments that they have, until they bring them to the square… On the night of the Mawlid there are performances of nasheed after Maghrib in the citadel.”
So, this is the origin of this celebration on the occasion of the Prophet’s birthday. More recently idle entertainment, extravagance, and wasting of money and time have become associated with an innovation for which Allaah has not sent down any authority.
It is incumbent upon all Muslims to revive the Sunnah and put an end to Bid‘ah (innovation); they should not perform any action until they know the ruling of Allaah concerning it.
Celebrating the occasion of the birthday of the Prophet (r) is forbidden and is to be rejected for a number of reasons:
1 – It is not part of the Sunnah of the Messenger (r) or of the khaleefahs who succeeded him. Since this is the case, then it is a forbidden innovation, because the Prophet (r) said:
“I urge you to follow my Sunnah and the way of the rightly-guided khaleefahs after me; adhere to it and cling to it firmly. Beware of newly-invented things, for every newly-invented thing is an innovation (Bid‘ah) and every innovation is a going-astray.” (Ahmad & Tirmidhi)
Celebrating the Mawlid is an innovation introduced by the Shee‘ah Faatimids after the three best centuries of Islaam in order to corrupt the religion of the Muslims. If a person does anything in order to draw closer to Allaah which was not done by the Messenger (r) or enjoined by him, and was not done by the khaleefahs who succeeded him, this action implies that he is accusing the Messenger (r) of not fully explaining the religion to the people, and that he disbelieves in the words of Allaah what translates as:
“This day I have perfected for you your religion.”
(Al-Maa’idah: 3)
…because he is adding something extra and claiming that it is a part of the religion, which the Messenger (r) did not bring.
 2 – Celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (r) is an imitation of the Christians, because they celebrate the birth of the Messiah (u). Imitating them is extremely Haraam. The Hadeeth tells us that it is forbidden to imitate the Kuffaar, and we are commanded to differ from them. The Prophet (r) said:
“Whoever imitates a people is one of them” (Ahmad & Abu Daawood).
And he said,
“Be different from the mushrikeen (polytheists)” (Muslim)
…especially with regard to things that are the symbols or rituals of their religion.
3 – Besides being Bid‘ah and an imitation of the Christians, both of which are Haraam, celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (r) is also a means that leads to exaggeration and excess in venerating him, which even goes as far as calling upon him (making Du‘aa to him) and seeking his help, instead of calling upon Allaah, as happens now among many of those who observe the Bid‘ah of the Mawlid, when they call upon the Messenger (r) instead of Allaah, and ask him for support, and sing Qaseedahs (odes) of shirk praising him, like Qaseedat Al-Burdah etc. The Prophet (r) forbade going to extremes in praising him, as he said:
“Do not extol me as the Christians extolled the son of Maryam. For I am just His slave, so call me the slave of Allaah and His Messenger” (Bukhaari)
… i.e., do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians exaggerated in praising the Messiah and venerated him until they worshipped him instead of Allaah. Allaah forbade them to do that when he said that which translates as:
“O people of the Scripture (Christians)! Do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allaah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a Messenger of Allaah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at command] from Him.”
(An-Nisaa’: 171).
Our Prophet (r) forbade us to exaggerate concerning him lest the same thing happen to us as happened to them, so he said:
“Beware of exaggeration, for those who came before you were destroyed because of exaggeration.” (An-Nasaa`i)
4 – Observing the innovation of the Prophet’s birthday opens the door to other kinds of Bid‘ah and being distracted by them from the Sunnah. Hence you find that the innovators are very active when it comes to Bid‘ah and very lazy when it comes to the Sunnah; they hate it and regard those who follow it as enemies, until their entire religion is innovated anniversaries and Mawlids. They have split into various groups, each of which commemorates the anniversary of its Imaam’s birth, such as the births of Al-Badawi, Ibn ‘Arabi, Al-Dasooqi and Al-Shaadhili. No sooner do they end the celebration of one birthday but they start the celebration of another. This results in exaggeration concerning these dead people and others, and in calling upon them instead of Allaah, believing that they can bring benefit and cause harm, until they deviate from the religion of Allaah and go back to the religion of the people of the Jaahiliyyah about whom Allaah says that which translates as:
“And they worship other than Allaah that which neither harms them nor benefits them, and they say: ‘These are our intercessors with Allaah.’ ”
(Yoonus: 18).
“And those who protectors besides Him [say]: ‘We worship them that they may bring us nearer to Allaah in position.’ ”
(Az-Zumar: 3).
Those who think that this Bid‘ah should be continued produce specious arguments which are flimsier than a spider’s web. These specious arguments may be dealt with as follows:
1 – Their claim that this is veneration of the Prophet (r):
The response to that is that the way to venerate him is to obey him, do as he commanded and avoid that which he forbade, and to love him; he is not to be venerated through innovations, myths and sins. Celebrating his birthday is of this blameworthy type because it is a sin. The people who venerated the Prophet (r) the most were the Sahaabah, may Allaah be pleased with them, as ‘Urwah Ibn Mas’ood, (y) , said to Quraysh:
“O people, I swear by Allaah that I have visited kings. I went to Caesar, Chasroes and the Negus, but I swear by Allaah that I never saw a king whose companions venerated him as much as the companions of Muhammad venerated Muhammad. By Allaah, whenever he spat it never fell to the ground, it fell into the hand of one his companions, then they would wipe their faces and skins with it. If he instructed them to do something, they would hasten to do as he commanded. When he did wudoo´, they would almost fight over his water. When he spoke they would lower their voices in his presence; and they did not stare at him out of respect for him.” (Bukhaari)
Yet despite this level of veneration, they never took the day of his birth as an ‘Eid (festival). If that had been prescribed in Islaam they would not have neglected to do that.
2 – Using as evidence the fact that many people in many countries do this.
The response to that is that evidence can only consist of that which is proven from the Prophet (r), and what is proven from the Prophet is that innovations are forbidden in general, and this is an innovation. What people do, if it goes against the evidence (Daleel), does not prove anything, even if many of them do it. Allaah says that which translates as:
“And if you obey most of those upon the earth, they will mislead you from the way of Allaah.”
(Al-An‘aam: 116)
Nevertheless, in every age, and all praise is due to Allaah, there have always been those who denounce this Bid‘ah and state clearly that it is false. Those who persist in following it after the truth has been explained to them have no proofs to fall back on.
Among those who denounced the celebration of this occasion was Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, in Iqtidaa’ Al-Siraat Al-Mustaqeem; Imaam Al-Shaatibi in Al-I’tisaam; Ibn Al-Haaj in Al-Madkhil; Shaykh Taaj Al-Deen ‘Ali Ibn ‘Umar Al-Lakhami who wrote an entire book denouncing it; Shaykh Muhammad Basheer Al-Sahsawaani Al-Hindi in his book Siyaanah Al-Insaan; Al-Sayyid Muhammad Rasheed Ridaa wrote an essay on this topic; Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Ibraaheem Aali Ash-Shaykh wrote a separate essay on it; Shaykh ‘Abd al-’Azeez Ibn Baaz; and others who are still writing and denouncing this Bid‘ah every year in the pages of newspapers and magazines, at a time when this Bid‘ah is widespread.
3 – They say that by celebrating the Mawlid they are keeping the memory of the Prophet (r) alive.
The answer to this is that the memory of the Prophet (r) is constantly kept alive by the Muslim, such as when his name (r) is mentioned in the Adhaan and Iqaamah and in Khutbahs, and every time the Muslim recites the Shahaadatayn after doing Wudoo´ and in the prayers, and every time he sends blessings upon the Prophet (r) in his prayers and when he is mentioned, and every time the Muslim does a Waajib (obligatory) or Mustahabb (recommended) action that was prescribed by the Messenger (r). In all of these ways (the Muslim) remembers him and the reward equivalent to the reward of the one who does that action goes back to the Prophet (r). Thus the Muslim constantly keeps the memory of the Messenger alive and has a connection with him night and day throughout his life through that which Allaah has prescribed, not only on the day of the Mawlid and things which are Bid‘ah and go against the Sunnah, for that puts one at a distance from the Messenger (r) and the Messenger will disown him because of that.
The Messenger (r) has no need of this innovated celebration, because Allaah has already bestowed veneration and respect upon him, as He says that which translates as:
“And raised high for you your repute.”
(Ash-Sharh: 4)
This is because the name of Allaah is not mentioned in the Adhaan, Iqaamah or Khutbahs, except that the Messenger (r) is mentioned after Him; this is sufficient veneration, love and renewal of his memory, and sufficient encouragement to follow him.
Allaah did not refer to the birth of the Messenger (r) in the Qur`aan, rather He referred to his Mission, and says what translates as:
“Indeed, Allaah conferred a great favour on the believers when He sent among them a Messenger (Muhammad) from among themselves.”
(Aal ‘Imraan: 164)
“It is He who sent among the unlettered a Messenger from themselves.”
(Al-Jumu’ah: 2).
4 – They may say that the celebration of the Prophet’s birthday was introduced by a knowledgeable and just king who intended thereby to draw closer to Allaah.
Our response to that is that Bid‘ah is not acceptable, no matter who does it. A good intention does not justify a bad deed and even if a person died as a knowledgeable and righteous person, this does not mean that he was infallible.
5 – They say that celebrating the Mawlid comes under the heading of Bid‘ah Hasanah (good innovation) because it is based on giving thanks to Allaah for the Prophet (r)!
Our response to that is that there is nothing good in innovation. The Prophet (r) said:
“Whoever innovates anything in this matter of ours (i.e., Islaam), that is not part of it will have it rejected.” (Bukhaari)
And he (r) said:
“Every innovation is a going astray.” (Ahmad & Tirmidhi)
The ruling on innovations is that they are all misguidance, but this specious argument suggests that not every Bid‘ah is a going astray, rather there are good innovations.
Ibn Rajab, may Allaah have mercy upon him, said:
“The words of the Prophet (r), ‘every innovation is a going astray’ is a concise but comprehensive comment which includes everything; it is one of the most important principles of religion. It is like his words:
‘Whoever innovates anything in this matter of ours (i.e., Islaam) that is not part of it will have it rejected.’ (Bukhaari)
 Whoever innovates anything and attributes it to Islaam when it has no basis in the religion, this is a going astray and is nothing to do with Islaam, whether that has to do with matters of belief (‘Aqeedah) or outward and inward words and deeds.”
These people have no proof that there is any such thing as a “good innovation” apart from the words of ‘Umar (y) concerning Taraaweeh prayers when he said:
‘What a good innovation this is.’ (Bukhaari)
They also said that things were innovated which were not denounced by the Salaf, such as compiling the Qur`aan into one volume and writing and compiling the collections of Ahadeeth.
The response to that is that these matters had a basis in Islam, so they were not newly-invented.
‘Umar (y) said: ‘What a good Bid‘ah,’ meaning innovation in the linguistic sense, not in the Shar‘i sense. Whatever has a basis in Islam, if it is described as an innovation, is an innovation in the linguistic sense, not in the Shar‘i sense, because innovation in the Shar‘i sense means that which has no basis in Islam.
Compiling the Qur`aan into one book has a basis in Islam, because the Prophet (r) had commanded that the Qur`aan be written down, but it was scattered, so the Sahaabah compiled it in one volume so as so protect and preserve it.
The Prophet (r) led his companions in praying Taraaweeh for a while, then he stopped doing that, lest it become obligatory on them. The Sahaabah, may Allaah be pleased with them, continued to pray it individually during the life of the Prophet (r) and after his death, until ‘Umar Ibn Al-Khattaab (y) gathered them behind one Imaam as they used to pray behind the Prophet (r). Therefore, this was not an innovation introduced into the religion.
Compiling the collections of Ahadeeth also has a basis in Islaam. The Prophet (r) ordered that some Ahaadeeth be written down for some of his companions when they asked him for that. Generally, doing this during his lifetime was prohibited, for fear that the Qur`aan might be mixed with things that were not part of it (from the sayings of the Prophet (r). When the Prophet (r) died, this fear was no longer a factor, because the Qur`aan had been completed and arranged in order before he died. The Muslims compiled the Sunnah after that in order to preserve it and keep it from being lost. May Allaah reward them with good on behalf of Islaam and the Muslims, because they preserved the Book of their Lord and the Sunnah of their Prophet (r) from being lost or being tampered with.
We may also say to them: why was this act of thanksgiving, as they call it, not done by the best generations, the Sahaabah, Taabi‘een and followers of the Taabi‘een, who loved the Prophet (r) the most and who were most keen to do good and give thanks? Are those who introduced the innovation of the Mawlid more rightly-guided than them? Do they give more thanks to Allaah? Definitely not!
 6 – They may say that celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (r) is indicative of their love for him; this is one way of showing that, and showing love of the Prophet (r) is prescribed in Islam!
The answer to that is that undoubtedly loving the Prophet (r) is obligatory for every Muslim; he should love him more than he loves himself, his child, his father and all of mankind – may my father and mother be sacrificed for him – but that does not mean that we should introduce innovations for doing so that have not been prescribed for us. Loving him dictates that we should obey him and follow him, for that is one of the greatest manifestations of love, as it is said: “If your love is sincere then obey him; for the lover obeys the one whom he loves.”
Loving the Prophet (r) implies keeping his Sunnah alive, adhering firmly to it, and avoiding words and deeds that go against it. Undoubtedly everything that goes against his Sunnah is a reprehensible innovation (Bid‘ah) and a manifest act of disobedience. That includes celebrating his birthday and other kinds of Bid‘ah. Having good intentions does not mean that it is permissible to introduce innovations into the religion. Islaam is based on two things, purity of intention and following the Prophet (r).
Allaah says that which translates as:
“Yes [on the contrary], whoever submits his face [i.e., self] in Islaam to Allaah while being a doer of good will have his reward with his Lord. And no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve.”
(Al-Baqarah: 112)
Submitting one’s face to Allaah means being sincere towards Allaah, and doing good means following the Messenger (r) and implementing his Sunnah.
7 – Another of their specious arguments is when they say that by celebrating the Mawlid and reading the biography of the Prophet (r) on this occasion, they are encouraging people to follow his example!
We say to them that reading the biography of the Prophet (r) and following his example are required of the Muslim all the time, all year long and throughout his life. Singling out a specific day for that with no evidence for doing so is an innovation, and
“…every innovation is a going astray.” (Ahmad & Tirmidhi)
Bid‘ah does not bear any fruit but evil and it leads to a person distancing himself from the Prophet (r).
In conclusion, celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (r), whatever form it takes, is a reprehensible innovation. The Muslims should put a stop to this and other kinds of Bid‘ah, and occupy themselves with reviving and adhering to the Sunnah. They should not be deceived by those who promote and defend this Bid‘ah, for these types of people are more interested in keeping innovations alive than in reviving the Sunnah; they may not even care about the Sunnah at all. Whoever is like this, it is not permissible to imitate him or follow his example, even if the majority of people are like this. Rather we should follow the example of those who follow the path of the Sunnah, among the righteous Salaf and their followers, even if they are few. Truth is not measured by the men who speak it; rather men are measured by the truth.                                    
The Prophet (r) said:
“Whoever among you lives (for a long time) will see many differences. I urge you to follow my Sunnah and the way of the rightly-guided khaleefahs who come after me. Hold on to it firmly. Beware of newly-invented matters, for every innovation is a going astray.” (Ahmad & Tirmidhi)
So the Prophet (r) explained to us in this Hadeeth what we should do when there are differences of opinion, just as he explained that everything that goes against his Sunnah, be it words or deeds, is a Bid‘ah, and every Bid‘ah is a going astray.
If we see that there is no basis for celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (r), whether in the Sunnah or in the way of the rightly-guided khaleefahs, then it is one of the newly-invented matters, one of the Bid‘ahs which lead people astray. This principle is what is implied by this Hadeeth and is what is indicated by the Aayah which translates as:
“O you who have believed, Obey Allaah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allaah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allaah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.”
(An-Nisaa´: 59)
Referring to Allaah means referring to His Book, and referring to the Messenger (r) means referring to his Sunnah after he has passed away. The Qur`aan and Sunnah are the reference point in cases of dispute. Where in the Qur`aan or Sunnah does it indicate that it is prescribed in Islam to celebrate the Prophet’s birthday? Whoever does that or thinks that it is good must repent to Allaah from this and from other kinds of Bid‘ah. This is the attitude of the Muslim who is seeking the truth. But whoever is too stubborn and arrogant after proof has been established, then his reckoning will be with his Lord.
by 

Shaykh Dr Saalih ibn Fawzaan ibn 'Abdullaah al-Fawzaan   
member of the Permanent Committee for Islamic Research and Fataawa, Saudi Arabia.
download  

Conditions of nasheed being permissible

The guidelines and conditions of permissible nasheeds:

By studying the words of the scholars and trustworthy Shaykhs we may compile a list of guidelines and shar’i conditions which must be fulfilled for the nasheed to be permissible. That includes:

1. The words of the nasheed must be free of haraam and foolish words.

2. The nasheed should not be accompanied by musical instruments. No musical instrument is permitted except the duff for women on certain occasions. See the answer to question no. 20406.

3. It should be free of sound effects that imitate musical instruments, because what counts is what appears to be the case, and imitating haraam instruments is not permissible, especially when the bad effect is the same as that which happens with real instruments.

4. Listening to nasheed should not become a habit which takes up a person’s time and affects his duties and mustahabb actions, such as affecting his reading of Qur’aan and calling others to Allaah.

5. The performer of a nasheed should not be a woman performing in front of men, or a man with an enchanting appearance or voice performing in front of women.

6. One should avoid listening to performers with soft voices who move their bodies in rhythm, because there is fitnah in all of that and it is an imitation of the evildoers.

7. One should avoid the images that are put on the covers of their tapes, and more important than that, one should avoid the video clips that accompany their nasheeds, especially those which contain provocative movements and imitations of immoral singers.

8. The purpose of the nasheed should be the words, not the tune.

There follow some of the comments of the scholars which include the guidelines and conditions mentioned above

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for detail and complete Ruling
http://islamqa.com/en/ref/91142/nasheed.

Issue of Raful Yadayn

Praise be to Allaah.


The hadeeth to which the questioner refers was narrated by al-Bukhaari (735) and Muslim (390) from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them both), who said that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to raise his hands to shoulder level when he started to pray, when he said “Allaahu akbar” before bowing in rukoo’, and when he raised his head from rukoo’.

The majority of scholars followed this hadeeth and said that it is mustahabb for the worshipper to raise his hands at the points mentioned in the hadeeth.

Imaam al-Bukhaari (may Allaah have mercy on him) wrote a separate book on this issue which he called Juz’ fi Raf’ al-Yadayn (Section on Raising the Hands), in which he proved that the hands should be raised at these two points on the prayer, and he strongly denounced those who go against that. He narrated that al-Hasan said: “The Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to raise their hands during prayer when they bowed and when they stood up (from bowing).” Al-Bukhaari said, “Al-Hasan did not exclude any of the Sahaabah from that, and it was not proven that any one among the Sahaabah did not raise his hands.”

See al-Majmoo’ by al-Nawawi, 3/399-406.

We do not know whether the ahaadeeth about raising the hands reached Abu Haneefah (may Allaah have mercy on him) or not, but they did reach his followers. But they did not follow them because they had other ahaadeeth and reports which said that the hands should not be raised except when saying “Allaahu akbar” at the beginning of the prayer.

These ahaadeeth include the following:

The hadeeth narrated by Abu Dawood (749) from al-Baraa’ ibn ‘Aazib, which says that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to raise his hands almost to his ears when he started to pray, then he did not repeat (this action).

The hadeeth narrated by Abu Dawood (748) from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Mas’ood (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: “Shall I not lead you in prayer as the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did?” Then he prayed and he only raised his hands once.

See Nasb al-Raayah by al-Zayla’i, 1/393-407.

But these ahaadeeth were classed as da’eef (weak) by the imams of hadeeth.

The hadeeth of al-Baraa’ was classed as da’eef by Sufyaan ibn ‘Uyaynah, al-Shaafa’i, al-Humaydi the shaykh of al-Bukhaari, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Yahya ibn Ma’een, al-Daarimi, al-Bukhaari, and others.

The hadeeth of Ibn Mas’ood was classed as da’eef by ‘Abd-Allaah ibn al-Mubaarak, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, al-Bukhaari, al-Bayhaqi, al-Daaraqutni and others. Similarly, the reports which were narrated from some of the Sahaabah about not raising the hands are all da’eef. We have quoted above the words of al-Bukhaari (may Allaah have mercy on him): “…it was not proven that any one among the Sahaabah did not raise his hands.”

See Talkhees al-Habeer by al-Haafiz ibn Hajar, 1/221-223.

Once it is proven that these ahaadeeth and reports which say that the hands should not be raised are weak, then the ahaadeeth which say that the hands should be raised remain strong with no opposing reports. Hence the believer should not fail to raise his hands at the points in prayer described in the Sunnah. He should strive to make his prayer like the prayer of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) who said, “Pray as you have seen me praying.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 631). Hence ‘Ali ibn al-Madeeni, the shaykh of al-Bukhaari, said: “It is the duty of the Muslims to raise their hands when they bow in rukoo’ and when they stand up from rukoo’.” Al-Bukhaari said: “ ‘Ali was the most knowledgeable of the people of his time.”

Once the Sunnah has been explained clearly, no one has the right to ignore it, following whoever among the scholars said that. Imaam al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “The scholars are agreed that if the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) becomes clear to a person, it is not permissible for him to ignore it in favour of the opinion of anyone.”

Madaarij al-Saalikeen, 2/335.

“If a man is following Abu Haneefah or Maalik or al-Shaafa’i or Ahmad, and he sees that the view of another madhhab concerning a given matter is stronger, and he follows that, then he has done well, and that does not detract from his religious commitment or good character. There is no scholarly dispute on this point. Rather this is more in accordance with the truth and is more beloved by Allaah and His Messenger.”

(Said by Shaykh al-Islam – may Allaah have mercy on him – in al-Fataawa, 22/247).

The scholars who said that the hands should not be raised based on their own ijtihaad are to be excused, for they will be rewarded for their ijtihaad and their seeking the truth, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “If a judge passes judgement based on his own ijtihaad and he is correct, he will have two rewards; if he passes judgement based on his own ijtihaad and he makes a mistake, he will have one reward.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 7352; Muslim, 1716). See Raf’ al-Malaam ‘an al-A’immah al-A’laam by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah.

Note:

 There is a fourth place where it is mustahabb to raise the hands during prayer; that is when standing up after the first Tashahhud for the third rak’ah.

May Allaah help us all to know the truth and follow it.

And Allaah knows best. May Allaah send blessings and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid


http://islamqa.com/en/ref/21439/raf 

Issue of Raful Yadayn.

This is a short treatise prepared especially in examining the issue and answering the objections brought forth by people, concerning the issue of Raful Yadayn.

Alhamdulillah, the analysis and comments that have been made are extremely detailed and beneficial, without divulging into any personal attacks upon any madhab. To research and seek the truth is the way of the believers.

We pray to Allah that he guides us all. May Allah make this treatise a means of guidance. Aameen.

To raise the hands is sunnah, and has been quoted to the degree of tawatur from every generation of Muslims from the time of the Sahabah, Tabi'un and Tabi' Tabieen till today.

It is an undeniable fact that the reports concerning raising the hands at the time of rukoo' and when rising from it are mutawaatir from the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam.

In fact, the Imaam of the Hanafee Deobandees, Anwar Shah Kaashmiree writes, "The chain of narration and practice concerning Rafal Yadain are mutawaatir, and there can be no doubt regarding this. There is not a single word of this action which has been abrogated". This statement should be sufficient for those who take Anwar Shah as the ultimate authority in matters of the religion, and all praise are to Allah and may he guide us all.

Ibn al-Qayyim writes, after affirming that the Prophet raised his hands at ruku and when rising from it: "Without question, nothing opposing is established from him."

Imaam Marwazee states, "The scholars of all the lands have consensus on the practice of raising the hands, except the people of Koofah'' Imaam Bukhaari also mentions something similar to this in his juzz.

Shaikh Abdul Hayy Lucknowee said; "Without doubt the truth with us is that raising the hands whilst performing ruku and raising the head from it is established and from the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam and the companions with strong and (Saheeh) authentic chains."
In Sa'ayah Sharh Waqaayah (2/213)

Shaah Waleeullaah Muhaddith Dehlawee said; "The one who does Raf al-Yadain is more beloved to me than the one who does not because, there are many Ahadeeth for performing Raf al-Yadain and they are authentic.'
In Hujjatullah al-Baalighah (2/10), also in Kifaayah Liman Lahu Diraayah

Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi said "When a hadeeth is narrated from 10-(ten) companions then that position (Saying or action) is given precedence and is also mutawaatir." (Bawaadir an-Nawaadir (p.136)(as is the case)

Indeed, Taaj ud Deen Subkee mentions in Tabaqaat ash-Shaafiyyah (2/100) that Shaafi'ee said, 'It is not befitting [halaal] for any muslim after knowing of the ahaadeeth of raising the hands and then not to follow them'

Musannaf Abdur Razzaaq (2/80) reports authentically the practice of Uthmaan. All four rightly guided Khaliphs performed Raf al-Yadain (at-Ta'leeq al-Mughnee (p.ll),Juzz (p.9) of Subkee, Muhalla (1/95) of Ibn Hazm.

Indeed, this is a detailed narration which fully mentions raising the hands whilst going into rukoo, rising from it and rising from the tashhaud. Further this hadeeth was narrated in front of ten companions after the death of the prophet, who all confirmed the prophets prayer was as such. This is a strong proof against those who state the raising of the hands may be abrogated or that it is more better not to perform it. Ibn Khuzaimah narrates from his teacher Yahya Zuhlee in his Saheeh (1/198), 'One who after hearing this narration does not raise his hands whilst going into rukoo and raising from it then, his prayer is deficient, and should be repeated'. 53 Ibn Maajah 34 Bukhaari in his Juzz Raf al-Yadain (p.8), Ibn Abee Shaybah (1/239), Taareekh Kabeer of Bukhaari (3/87). After reporting this narration Bukhaari states, The wives of the companions practiced raising the hands and they knew more than those who do not practice it today'.

Imaam Sa'eed Ibn Jubayr has also mentioned the raising of the hands from the companions as a whole, without, excluding any one of them. (Baihaqee 2/85). Imaam Salmah bin Deenaar Abu Haazim E'raaj Madanee, the Taabi'ee is reported to have said, "I saw all the people raising there bands whilst going into rukoo and coming up from it" (Taareekh Ibn Asaakir (1/263), Diraayah (1/154) and Talkhees al-I iabeer (p.220). One can understand from these statements that the second generation of the taabeeyn used to practice the raising of the hands at the various places in salah. Of course, had the companions totally abandoned it or thought it better to leave then, no doubt the second generations who saw and met the companions would have followed suite. Indeed the companions were the teachers and scholars for the second generation.

It is, for the above reason that we see the companion ibn Umar and famous taabiy Saeed bin Jubayr say, "The raising of the hands is the ornament of prayer". (Juz of Bukhaaree (pp. 108-109), Baihaaqee (2/85), Sharh Muhazzabof Nawawee (3/405), Talhkees al-I labeer (1/220), Tamheed of Ibn Abdul Barr (3/167), al-Istadhkaar of Ibn Abdul Barr (2/122).

The great Taabi'ee Abu Qilaabah bin Abdullah called it, "The honour of the prayer". (Hilyatul Awliyaa of Asbahaanee (2/281). The teacher of Imaam Abu Ilaneefah, Ayyoob Sayakhtiaanee used to raise the hands whilst going into rukoo and rising from and on the other hand, accept statements in which people have "never" seen anyone perform such an action as well as statements claiming that raising the hands "was most likely not practiced widely during the time of the Tab'iun."? If the practice of raising the hands was mutawaatir, and indeed it has been proven that it was, how could it not have been practiced widely? By its very definition, mutawaatir indicates extensive practice in each generation. This throws grave doubts onto any statement in which someone claims they "never" saw anyone doing it or that "no one" ever did it or that the Prophet "never" raised his hands!


UNDERSTANDING IMAM ABU HANEEFAH'S POSITION

Sufyan bin Uyaynah reports that Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Awzaee met and came together in Makkah. Imam Awzaee asked, 'What is it with you — and in one narration, with you people of Iraq, - that you do not raise your hands in salah at the time of bowing into ruk'you and rising therefrom?'...

If we proceed on the assumption that the narration about this discussion between Imaam Abu Haneefah and Imaam al-Awzaa'-ee is authentic, there are a number of observations that one can make:

1)In the narration Abu Haneefah said: "Because nothing authentic has been established about it from the Prophet." If this is what he said, one would have to concede that he did not know of any authentic hadeeth from the Prophet about raising the hands at ruku' etc. which is rather unusual given the fact that such hadeeth are mutawaatir! Perhaps this is why Imaam Abu Haneefah did not rule in favour of raising the hands because, according to his words here, he was completely unaware of anything authentic about it from the Prophet. However, what excuse do the later followers of his Madhab have now that those authentic mutawaatir hadeeth have come to light?

THE ISNAAD QUOTED BY ABU HANEFAH AND Al-AWZAA'EE

2)Here is the isnaad that Imaam Abu Haneefah quoted in support of not raising the hands: "Hammaad related to me from Ibraaheem from Alqamah and Aswad from Ibn Mas'ood..." Here is the isnaad that Imaam al-Awzaa'ee quoted in favour of raising the hands: "Zuhri narrated to me from Salim from his father
(Abdullah ibn Umar)."

A critical analysis of these two chains of transmission will reveal the following:

The isnaad quoted by Imaam al-Awzaa'ee is the shorter of the two and this is what is preferred in the science of hadeeth.

"...the students of hadeeth are concerned chiefly with attaining the briefest isnaad. " (Ibn al-Jawzee in Sayid ul-Khaatir, (p.216))

"Seeking the shortest isnaad is a sunnahfrom those who have preceded. "(al-Khateeb al-Baghdaadee in Al-Jaami Lee Akhlaaq ar-Raawee ))

According to Imaam Ahmed and Ishaaq ibn Rahawayyah the most authentic of all isnaads is 'az-Zuhree from Saalim ibn Abdullah from his father Abdullah ibn Umar' and this is the exact isnaad mentioned here by Imaam al-Awzaa'ee. (see Tayseer Mustalah al-Hadeeth, (p.37), of Dr. at-Tahhaan)

Looking at the strength of narrators in each isnaad one would have to conclude that the isnaad quoted by al-Awzaa'ee is the stronger of the two. Here is a quick overview of each narrator using Ibn Hajr's at-Taqreeb as a basis for their biographies:


ABU HANEEFAH'S ISNAAD
HAMMAD(He is Hamaad ibn Abee Sulaymaan)

Ibn Hajar said: "A faqeeh, truthful, has some vain fancies."

IBRAHIM (He is Ibrahim ibn Yazeed ibn Qays ibn al-Aswad al-Nakha'ee)
Ibn Hajr said: "A faqeeh, thiqah except that he commits a great deal of lrsaal (mursal narrations)."

ALQAMAH & ASWAD
(He is Alqamah ibn Qays ibn Abdullah al-Nakha'ee)
(He is Al-Aswad ibn Yazeed ibn Qays al-Nakha'ee)
Ibn Hajr said about Alqamah: "Thiqah, reliable, faqeeh, worshipper."
Ihn Hajr said about Aswad: "Thiqah excelled, faqeeh."


AL-AWZAA'EE'S ISNAAD

ZUHRI(He is Nfuhammad ibn Muslim ibn Ubaydallah ibn Abdullah ibn Shihaab az-Zuhri)

Ibn Hajar said: "The faqeeh, the haafidh, they are agreed on his high esteem and mastery."

SALIM (Salim ibn Abdullah ibn Umar ibn al-Khattaab)
Ibn Hajr said: "One of the great faqeehs (of Madinah), he was reliable, a worshipper, distinguished."


The Companions of the Prophet (saws)

What follows, is a list of 'some' [for the sake of brevity] of the Companions who narrate the practice of raising the hands at the time of going into rukoo, rising from it, and other stages of the Sala'h, with brief footnotes for the benefit of the reader. The fact of the matter is that, each narration includes narrators who are from the second, third generations and beyond. No doubt, if raising the hands in these positions were abrogated or less superior than not to raise the hands, then, each narrator after the blessed prophet would not report such an action or act upon it. However, we find contra to this in the various narrations that are narrated by the companions mentioned below

Abu Hurairah
There are 5 narrations from him. Bukhaari mentions in his Juz Raf al-Yadain, by, Abu Dawood (1/108) with Au'n al-Ma'bood (1/268), Nasaa'ee (1/104), Ibn Maajah (1/62), Ahmad (2/132), Ibn Khuzaimah (1/344), ad-Daarqutnee (1/296). Dhahabee in Tadhkirrah tul-Huffaadh (1/444), Ibn Hajr in Al-Aa'maalee (p.357) [manuscript] authenticates this narration. He also authenticates it in Talkhees al Habeer (1/219), Khateeb Baghdaadee in Tareekh Baghdaad (7/394) Also in Musnad Shaamain of Tabaraanee [manuscript] (p.186). Ibn Abdul Barr in at-Tamheed (3/80) [manuscript]. Ponder upon this. The Tabi'ee and teacher of Imaam Abu Haneefah narrates that he saw [obviously after the death of the prophet] Abu Hurairah raise the hands in the various places in prayer, eg, whilst going into rukoo. Juzz of Raf al-Yadain of Bukhaari (p.63) and f amheed of Ibn Abdul Barr (1 /62]. Is it then a better practice to leave raising the hands?

Abdullah ibn Umar
21 Bukhaari (1/102) and also, Muslim, Abu Dawood (1/104), at-Tirmidhee, an-Nasaa'ee, Ibn Maajah, ibn Hibbaan, Sunan Kubraa of Baihaaqee (2/80), Ibn Khuzaimah, Maalik, nt-Tnbnraanee, ad-Daarqutnee (1/279), Ahmad, Musnad Abu Ya'aln (2/263), Umdatul Qaaree of Aynee Hanafee (5/277), Ibn Hajr in Fath-ul Baaree (2/222), Nasb ur-Raayah of Az-Zaila'ee Hanafee (1/409), Talkhees al-IIabeer (1/218), Ad-Diraayah (1/153) of Ibn Hajr, Taareekh larjaan (p.433), Ma'rifah of Ilaakim (p.218), Humaidee (2/288) and At-Tamheed of Ibn Abdul Barr (5/65). In fact, Bukhaari reports in his Juzz (p.9) that, Ibn Umar after the passing away of the prophet used to throw pebbles at those who would not perform it. Obviously, this narration speaks for itself about the argument of abrogation or better to leave the raising of the hands.

Abdullah ibn Abbaas
Ibn Maajah (1/62), Abu Dawood (1/108) and it is saheeh as established by Bukhaari in his Juzz.

Anas ibn Maalik
Bukhaari mentions in his ]uzz that, Ibn Maajah, ibn Hibbaan, Ibn Abee Shaybah, ad-Daarqutnee all mention this narration. Abu Ya'laa (1/91) manuscript. Ibn Daqeeq said in At-Ta'leequl Mughnee (1/290), all of its narrators are reliable and authentic upon the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim', Ibn Mulqm in Badr al-Muneer states,' its chain is authentic upon the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim'. In total there are 7 ahaadeeth from Anas also reported in, Taareekh of Khateeb Baghdaadee (2/386), (4/183), Tabaraanee Awsth (2/102, 2/293, 1/20).

Abu Sa'eed al-Khudree
Bukhaari in his Juzz Raf al-Yadam (p.49), Mussannaf Ibn Abee Shaybah

Jaabir ibn Abdullah
There are 4 ahaadeeth from him. Ibn Maajah (1/62), and Ibn Hajr in Ad-Diraayah (1/154) and Bauseeree in Misbah uz-Zujaajah Fee Zawaa'id Ibn Maajah (1/108) said, all its narrators are trustworthy and acceptable. Likewise, Aabid Sindhee in A1-Mu\vaahib al-I.ateefah Sharh Musnad Abee Haneefah (1/162) states, Imaam Ilaakim and Baihaqee have authenticated this narration. Also in Ahmad (3/310), Ma'rifah Uloom al-IIadeeth of TIaakim (p.121), Akhbaar Asbahaan of Abee Nuaym (1/165), al-Mataalib al-Aaliyyah (1/69), Taareekh al-Kabeer of Bukhaari (4/105).

Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-Aas
Baihaaqee in as-Sunan al-Kubraa (2/74)

Abu Moosaa al-Ash'aree
Ad-Daaraqutnee (1/296)

Abdullah ibn az-Zubair
Abu Dawood, Ahmad with references as under the note concerning Abu Bakr, above.

Al-Baraa' ibn Aazib'
Al-Baihaqee (2/77)

Maalik ibn al-Huwayrith
Al-Bukhaari (1/102) and also found with the same hadeeth in Muslim. Abu Dawood, Ibn Maajah, Ahmad, al-Baihaaqee, Abu Awaanah, Daarqutnee, Musnad Shaameen of Tabaraanee, Sharh us-Sunnah of Baghawee and others as mentioned by Bukliaari in his book of juzz Raf ul-Yadam (pp. 4-5)

Waa'il Ibn Hujr
There are 6 narrations from him. Nasaa'ee (1/105), Muslim (p.183), Bukhaari in his Juzz (p.8) mentions Abu Dawood Tayaalisee in his musnad (p-138), Ibn Maajah, Ahmad (4/318), ibn Hibbaan (3/352), ad-Daarqutnee, al-Baihaaqee as reporting the same. Also found in Al-Muntaqaa of ibn Jarood' (p.81), Sharh Maa'nee al-Aathaar of Tahaawee (1/132), Ilumaidee (2/342). The narration in Ilumaidee mentions the raising of the hands in the various positions from the prophet and then Wail states, 'I returned in the winter and saw the companions covered in large outer garments from beneath which they performed the raising of the hands'. It is therefore clear, that the companions as a whole performed this action and Wail did not exclude any one of them from such an action.

Abu Humayd as-Saa'idee
Mishkaat (1/86), which also quotes Ibn Maajah (1 /26), ad-Daarimee, and Tirmidhee who called this narration as 'hasan-saheeh'. Abu Dawood (p.7) mentions the same narration. Indeed, this is a detailed narration which fully mentions raising the hands whilst going into rukoo, rising from it and rising from the tashhaud. Further this hadeeth was narrated in front of ten companions after the death of the prophet, who all confirmed the prophets prayer was as such. This is a strong proof against those who state the raising of the hands may be abrogated or that it is more better not to perform it. Ibn Khuzaimah narrates from his teacher Yahya Zuhlee in his Saheeh (1/198), 'One who after hearing this narration does not raise his hands whilst going into rukoo and raising from it then, his prayer is deficient, and should be repeated'.

Umayr ibn Habeeb
Ibn Maajah

Umm ad-Dardaa
Bukhaari in his Juzz Raf al-Yadain (p.8), Ibn Abee Shaybah (1/239), Taareekh Kabeer of Bukhaari (3/87). After reporting this narration Bukhaari states, 'The wives of the companions practiced raising the hands and they knew more than those who do not practice it today'.

Imaam Sa'eed Ibn Jubayr has also mentioned the raising of the hands from the companions as a whole, without, excluding any one of them. (Baihaqee 2/85). Imaam Salmah bin Deenaar Abu Haazim E'raaj Madanee, the Taabi'ee is reported to have said, "I saw all the people raising there bands whilst going into rukoo and coming up from it" (Taareekh Ibn Asaakir (1/263), Diraayah (1/154) and Talkhees al-I iabeer (p.220).
One can understand from these statements that the second generation of the taabeeyn used to practice the raising of the hands at the various places in salah. Of course, had the companions totally abandoned it or thought it better to leave then, no doubt the second generations who saw and met the companions would have followed suite. Indeed the companions were the teachers and scholars for the second generation.
It is, for the above reason that we see the companion ibn Umar and famous taabiy Saeed bin Jubayr say, "The raising of the hands is the ornament of prayer". (Juz of Bukhaaree (pp. 108-109), Baihaaqee (2/85), Sharh Muhazzabof Nawawee (3/405), Talhkees al-I labeer (1/220), Tamheed of Ibn Abdul Barr (3/167), al-Istadhkaar of Ibn Abdul barr (2/122). The great Taabi'ee Abu Qilaabah bin Abdullah called it, "The honour of the prayer". (Hilyatul Awliyaa of Asbahaanee (2/281). The teacher of Imaam Abu Haneefah, Ayyoob Sayakhtiaanee used to raise the hands whilst going into rukoo and rising from it. (Baihaqee (2/83), Al-Muhazzab of Dhahabee (2/49), Jawaahir ul mukallah of Sakhawee (p.152). Therefore we find the superiority if this action from these narrations. But yet, one in the first three generations, from an authentic chain, have said that the prayer is less in reward if one performs this action.


The Practice Of The Four Rightly Guided Caliphs

What follows, is a list of 'some' [for the sake of brevity] of the Companions who narrate the practice of raising the hands at the time of going into rukoo, rising from it, and other stages of the Sala'h, with brief footnotes for the benefit of the reader. The fact of the matter is that, each narration includes narrators who are from the second, third generations and beyond. No doubt, if raising the hands in these positions were abrogated or less superior than not to raise the hands, then, each narrator after the blessed prophet would not report such an action or act upon it. However, we find contra to this in the various narrations that are narrated by the companions mentioned below.

1) Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq
As-Sunan al-Kubraa of Baihaaqee (2/73-74) who also authenticated nil of its chain of narrators. Imaam Dhahnbee in Al-Muhaxxab (2/49) affirms what Baihnaqee said. Ilaafidh Sakhawee in Al-]a\vaahir ul Mukallalah ill Ahaadeth al Musalsalah (p.56) [manuscript] narrates the same. The hadeeth of Abu Bakr is reported with a full chain including the companions, Taabr'een, Tabi-taabi'een right ii]iio Imaam Baihaat]ce himself. No doubt, this narration is a clear proof of the continuation of raising the hands in rukoo and rising from it, throughout the generations, thus refuting the claim that this action was abrogated or better to leave.


Umar ibn al-Khattaab
Baihaaqee (2/84), Ad-Daarqutnee, Nasb ur-Raayah of Az-Zaila'ee Hanafee (1/416). Ibn Ilajr mentions in Talkhees al-ITabeer (1/219) that its chain of narration is 'Mahfooz' i.e. proven. Nafkh ush-Shuzee of Ibn Sayyid An Naas (1 /217-218) who said all the narrators in this chain are reliable and acceptable, Juzz Raf al-Yadain (p.13) of Bukhaari and Juzz Raf al-Yadain (p.6) of Subkee. Note, Umar taught the taabi'een to prayer in the Prophets mosque and he raised his hands in the various positions of the prayer. Nasb ur-Raayah (1/416), Talkhees al-Habeer (1/218), Khiiaafiyyaat of Baihaaqi referenced in Nafkh ash-Shuzaa of Ibn Sayyid an-Naas (2/218), who said all its narrators are reliable and acceptable.

Ali ibn Abi Taalib and Uthmaan
Nasb ur-Raayah (1/412) and ibn Hajrs Talkhees al-IIabeer (1/219) mention it is reported by, Abu Dawood (1/198) with Au'n al-Ma'bood (1/271), at-Tirrm'dhee (1/239) with Tuhfaa tul Ahwadhee (4/239), an-Nasaa'ee, Ibn Maajah (1/183), Ahmad (1/93), Baihaaqee (2/74) ad-Daarqutnee (1/287), Ibn Khuzaimah (1/294), Tahaawee in Maa'nee al-Aathaar (1/131), ad-Diraayah (1/153), Tahseel al-Qaaree (part 3/page 774). Tirmidhee who said it is Ilasan/Saheeh. Ahmad ibn Hanbal graded it as saheeh. Musannaf Abdur Razzaaq (2/80) reports authentically the practice of Uthmaan.

All four rightly guided Khaliphs performed Raf al-Yadain (at-Ta'leeq al-Mughnee (p.11),Juzz (p.9) of Subkee, Muhalla (1/95) of Ibn Hazm

IMAAM SHAAFI' EE'S POSITION

Imaam Taj ud Deen as Subkee relates, concerning the famous student of the Imaan, Abu Ibraheem ibn Yahyaa al-Muznee that, "I have heard Shaafi'ee say that it is not halaal for one to abandon raising the hands at various places after one knows that the Prophet used to raise his hands."

After recording the above, Imam Subkee states, ' It is clear from this narration that Imaam Shaafi'ee held it to be obligatory to raise the hands at the various positions in prayer'.


Tabaqaat ash-Shaafiyyah (2/100)

Whilst mentioning raising the hands when descending for the sajdah, Shaykh al-Albaanee says: "This raising of the hands has been reported from ten Companions, and a number of the Salaf viewed it as correct, among them Ibn Umar, Ibn Abbaas. Hasan Basree, Taawoos, his son 'Abdullah, Naaf'ie the freed slave of Ibn Umar, Saalim the son of Ibn Umar, Qaasim bin Muhammad, Abdullah bin Deenar & Ataa. Also, Abdur Rahmaan bin Mahdi said, 'This is from the Sunnah', it was practised by the Imaam of the Sunnah, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and it has been quoted from Maalik & Shaafi'ee.

Similarly, al-Bukhaari writes: "Wakee said on the authority of ar-Rabee who said: 'I saw al-Hasan, Mujaahid, Ataa, Taawoos, Qays ibn Sa'ad and al-Hasan ibn Muslim raise their hands when they performed rukii' and when they prostrated" Abdur-Rahmaan ibn Mahdee said: "This is from the Sunnah."

Indeed, Abu Dawood says, "Ahmad ibn Hanbal was asked about the individual who did not perform the raising of the hands at the various places yet he knew of the narrations concerning this matter. Imaam Ahmad replied, 'never mind wether his prayer is accepted or not, he is lacking in the fundamentals of his religion".

SHAIKH-AL-ISLAAM ABDULLAH IBN MUBAARAK'S POSITION

Imaam Wakee bin Jarrah said that he prayed at a mosque in koofah wherein Imaam Abu Haneefah was praying next to Abdullah ibn Mubaarak, who was raising his hands whilst going into rukoo and raising from it.
Upon this, Abu Haneefah said to him 'I see you continuously raise your hands, do you intend to fly off some place?'
Ibn Mubaarak replied 'O Abu Haneefah I saw you raise your hands at the beginning of the prayer, why did you intend to fly off some place also?'
Hearing this, Abu Haneefah became silent.

Imaam Wakee continued to say "I have never seen any one so quick to reply as I have seen ibn Mubaarak do so."

This is reported in, juz Raf al-Yadain of Bukhaari (p.133), Ahmad ibn Hanbal in As-Sunah (p.59), Ibn Qutaybah in Mukhtalif ul-Hadeeth (p.66), ibn Hibbaan in ath-Thiqqaat (p.4) [manuscript] and Khateeb Baghdaadee in Tareekh al-Baghdaad (13/406)


IMAAM MAALIK'S POSITION

As far as the Maalikee scholars are concerned then the following is to be noted. All the authentic and non speculative evidence indicates that it was indeed the practice of Imaam Maalik to raise his hands at the ruku' and when rising from it etc, and that this is the position of his madhab on this issue. For example, there is no hadeeth in his al-Muwatta against the practice of raising the hands, whilst he does include in it the hadeeth of ibn Umar affirming raising the hands.
Masaa'il Imaam Ahmad (p.33)

A clear and decisive evidence for Imaam Maalik performing Raf al-Yadain is affirmed by the Imaam of the Hanafees, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan ash-Shaybaanee in his book "Muwatta Imaam Muhammad"

Imaam Muhammad said "From Maalik (Imaam Maalik ibn Anas) from Zuhree from Saalim from Abdullah ibn Umar who said, "When the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, began his prayer and whilst performing ruku and raising his head from it, he would do Raf al-Yadain upto his shoulders and then would say Saami Allaahu Liman Hamidah, Rabbana Lakal Hamd. "

Imaam Muhammad also states that performing Raf al-Yadain is also the position and Madhab of the people of Madeenah meaning Imaam Maalik.306
Imaam Bukhaari also brings a hadeeth in Saheeh al-Bukhaari on the authority of Abdullah ibn Umar. The chain in Bukhaari reads, 'narrated to us Abdullah ibn Muslimah from Maalik from ibn Shihaab (Zuhree) from Saalim from Abdullah ibn Umar from the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam that when he started the prayer he raised his hands to his shoulders and when he would say the Takbeerfor Ruku and rasie his head from Ruku he would also raise his hands and then he would say Saami Allaahu Liman Hamidah, Rabbana Lakal Hamd and he would not raise them between the prostrations.

Imaam Abdullah bin Wahb Al-Misree is Imaam Maaliks famous student. It is reported from him in Tamheed that, 'I was accompanying Imaam Maalik on the journey for hajj. When my animal came colser to Maaliks, I asked him, how should the one praying raise his hands in the prayer? He replied, I do not even like being asked about this [as the matter is well established]. Then he said, the hands are to be raised whilst beginning the salah, going into rukoo and rising from it.

Further, Maaliks students Abdul Azeez bin Naaf ie, Abu Musab Az-Zuhree, Waleed ibn Muslim and Sa'eed bin Abee Maryam all mention the raising of the hands in the various positions from Imaam Maalik.

Allaamah ibn Abdul Barr said, "Abu Mus'ab and Ibn Wahb mention that Imaam Maalik according to the Hadeeth of Ibn Umarused to do Rafal-Yadain at the first Takbeer, when going into Ruku and when rising from Ruku." This statement is also mentioned by Shaikh Anwar Shah Kashmiree and his foremost student Shaikh Binnouri.

In fact, Imaam Ashab the student of Maalik states, 'Imaam Maalik performed the raising of the hands up until his death, and it is only Ibn al-Qaasim who narrates contra to this. However, all the other reliable narrators contradict him in this'.

The famous Maalikee scholar and jurist Ibn Rushd mentions that, 'The narration of Ibn al-Qaasim is conflicting, strange and weak. It is to be abandoned'.

Ibn Hajr explains: "Ibn Abdul-Burr (or, in another manuscript: ibn Abdul-Hakkam) said: 'Nobody relates the leaving of raising the hands from Maalik except ibn al-Qaasim. That which we accept is the raising of the hands as in the hadeeth of ibn Umar. This is what Wahb and others narrate from Maalik. And Al-Khattaabee quoted, and al-Qurtubee followed him, that the last of the two sayings (from Maalik) and the most authentic from him was doing Rafal- Yadain. I have not seen the Malikiyyah use as evidence for not raising the hands except with the saying of ibn al-Qaasim."

Ibn al-Arabi al-Maalikee said while talking about raising the hands at ruku': "This is what the Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam used to do. And it is the madhab of Maalik according to what is related from him by the people ofMadeenah."

An-Nawawee also affirms that to raise the hands at ruku' and when rising from it is related from Imaam Maalik, however, in his view, the most we'll known position from Maalik is to raise them only at the. first Takbeer.

Al-Khattaabee, as mentioned earlier, wrote; "The final riding of Imaam Maalik on this issue was in favour of raising the hands at ruku' etc ".

Shaykh al-Albaanee writes;^"5 when discussing the issue of raising the hands at ruku' and when rising from it: "Imaam Maalik (rahimahullah) practised it right up to his death, as reported by Ibn 'Asaakir.

Shaykh Shu'aib al-Arna'oot writes in his notes to Mushkil al-Aathaar whilst discussing the various views about Maalik's raising of the hands: "Ibn Wahb, al-Waleed ibn Muslim, Sa'eed ibn Abee Maryam, Ashab, and Abu al-Mus'ab relate about Maalik that he would raise his hands as per the hadeelh ofibn Umar right up to his death."

The narration of ibn Qaasim of al-Mudawwanah al-Kubraa needs to be looked at, as Imaam Ibn Abdur Barr mentions Imaam Maalik doing Raf al-Yadain from Ibn Wahb and Ibn Qaasim himself. Shaikh Zaila'ee has also quoted this in his book Nasb ar-Raayah. Shaikh Binnouri Hanafee also mention Imaam Maalik performing Raf al-Yadain from Muhammad ibn al-Hasan, Ibn Wahb, Ibn al-Qaasim and a group of people.

Shaikh Anwar Shah Kashmiree brings the statement of at-Tamheed that Ibn Wahb and Ibn al-Qaasim mention Imaam Maalik performing Raf al-Yadain. The narration of Ibn Wahb affirming Raf al-Yadain for Imaam Maalik for going into Ruku and whilst rising from it is further elucidated in As-Sunan al-Kubraa of Baihaaqee, Ma'arifus Sunan Wal-Aathaar and Sharh Maa'nee al-Aathaar of Tahaawee.

Further more, the following Scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaah have reported that Imaam Maalik used to perform Raf al-Yadain whilst going into ruku and rising from it.

Disqus Shortname

designcart